Quick Jump:
 
Return to help about how to use Lab Online.
  Visual Inspection/Field Service  

This is the default screen that is loaded when you click an entry on the Equipment List Screen.
 
The screen is split into two tables, Visual Inspection and Field Service. Visual Inspections are done by S.D. Myers Personnel whenever they are on site to pull oil samples. Field Service information lists all services done to the transformer.
 
Visual Inspection
Date = Date the Visual Inspection was performed
Level = Level of the fluid in the transformer.
Temp = Top oil temperature.
P/V = Pressure/Vacuum gauge reading. Measure of gas space pressure. Positive 1 to 2 pounds is ideal. Negative pressure indicates the equipment is under vacuum. Consistent zero pressure may be a symptom of a leak.
Paint = Visual inspection of the quality of the paint on the exterior of the transformer. Paint value is usually listed as Good, Fair, or Poor.
Leaks = Any oil leaks coming from the transformer are documented here. Whenever possible the location of the leak is indicated.

Field Service
Date = Date a service or repair was performed
Service = Type of service performed.
____________
There are no graphs available for this screen.

  Liquid Screen Test  

These can also be referred to as the “Oil Screen Package”. The standard oil screen package consists of acid, IFT, D877 dielectric, color, specific gravity, and visual inspection (appearance and sediment). The D1816 dielectric is reported in the “Liquid Screen” section of the report even though it is separate from the standard oil screen package.

Date:

This is the draw date for the sample.

Acid:

Also referred to as acid number or neutralization number. Our standard test method is a manual titration, ASTM D974.

When oil oxidizes and ages in service, some of the oxidation decay products that are formed are acidic in nature, meaning that they will react with and be neutralized by a base (alkaline) material. The standard method uses potassium hydroxide (KOH) to react with the acidic compounds in the oil. The amount of KOH needed to react with all of the acidic compounds is noted by a color change of an indicator included in the oil/reagent mixture. As acid number increases for in service oil, it is a representative and direct measure of how much the oil has oxidized. Acid number is reported as milligrams KOH per gram of sample (mg KOH/g).

Classification of Neutralization Number results for transformer oil is as follows:

Neutralization Number Values

.

AC

QU

UN

mg KOH/g sample

< 0.05

> 0.05
< 0.10

> 0.10

Questionable or unacceptable results indicate that the oil has oxidized. A first test in the QU or UN range, or a sudden change exceeding the acceptable limit of 0.05 mg KOH/g, should be confirmed by a retest. Otherwise, if the acid number value is the result of a visible trend in the results over time or if a QU or UN value is confirmed by retest, the oil and the equipment should be hot oil cleaned.

IFT:

Also referred to as interfacial tension. Our standard method uses a ring tensiometer, following ASTM D971.

Materials that do not mix readily, such as water and transformer oil, form a surface or interface when they are brought into contact with each other. This interface between oil and water is a real barrier. It requires a measurable amount of force to move an object from the water up into the oil floating on top. The strength of the barrier between oil and water is the interfacial tension, usually abbreviated as IFT.

Clean, new, and well-refined transformer oil has a relatively high IFT, measured and reported as millinewtons per meter (or as dynes per centimeter, an essentially equivalent unit). As the oil ages and oxidizes, the polar compounds that are formed by the oxidation weaken the interface, reducing the interfacial tension. This occurs because the polar molecules are partially soluble in both the oil and in the water; so individual molecules are oriented along the interface.

New, highly refined oil is generally in the range of 45 to 50 mN/m for IFT. When installed in new equipment, the IFT of new oil will be reduced by about 5 to 10 mN/m as the oil picks up contamination from the inside of the new equipment. IFT will then gradually trend downward as the oil ages. IFT is also a very representative and direct measure of the degree of aging and oxidation of transformer oil.

The classification for interfacial tension results is as follows:

Interfacial Tension Values

.

AC

QU

UN

mN/m (dynes/cm)

> 32

< 32
> 28

< 28

As with acid number, questionable or unacceptable results indicate that the oil has oxidized. A first test in the QU or UN range, or a sudden change decreasing the value below the acceptable limit of 32 mN/m should be confirmed by a retest. Otherwise, if the acid number value is the result of a visible trend in the results over time or if a QU or UN value is confirmed by retest, the oil and the equipment should be hot oil cleaned.

D877:

There are two ASTM standard methods for dielectric breakdown voltage of insulating liquids, D877 and D1816. The D877 method measures the breakdown voltage using a test cell that has two flat disk electrodes spaced 0.10 inches apart. The test cell is filled, and the electrical potential between the two disk electrodes is steadily increased by 3,000 volts every second until there is a discharge between the electrodes, indicating that the dielectric strength of the oil between the electrodes has been exceeded.

The purpose of performing dielectric breakdown voltage determinations is to evaluate the oil's ability to withstand electrical stress. Contamination of the oil due to such things as fibers from the solid insulation, conductive particles, contamination by foreign matter, dirt, and water can affect dielectric breakdown voltage. The utility of the D877 test is limited because the test is not sensitive to moisture unless the moisture content exceeds 60% of the saturation level, and it is not measurably sensitive to oxidation products in service aged insulating oil.

The value from a D877 determination still has meaning, however, and is a valid tool as long as the limitations and relative insensitivity of the test are acknowledged. The D877 method will indicate the presence of some types of contamination in mineral oil filled transformers. Also, it is useful for equipment other than transformers that typically exhibit higher moisture content or where there may be metal particles present and for equipment filled with fluids other than mineral oil.

Classification of dielectric breakdown voltage results using the D877 method is as follows:

Dielectric Breakdown Voltage
Disk Electrodes D877 Method

.

AC

QU

UN

kilovolts

> 30 kV

< 30 kV
> 25 kV

< 25 kV

A QU or UN D877 value should be investigated to determine the cause and correct the condition, if appropriate.

D1816:

This standard method of measuring dielectric breakdown voltage uses spherical VDE (Verband Deutscher Elektrotechniker) electrodes. The method is run at one of two gap settings, either 1 millimeter (0.04 inches) or 2 millimeters (0.08 inches). The D1816 method for determining dielectric breakdown voltage is more sensitive to moisture and is also sensitive to polar compounds such as oil oxidation products. Sensitivity to some particles, particularly insulation fibers, is much more consistent with this method.

Because of the greater sensitivity, the rate of voltage rise is lower – 500 volts per second. Also, the D1816 test cell has a motor driven agitator. This agitator runs during the test to cause the oil to flow between the electrodes, carrying suspended particles into the gap between the VDE spheres where they can affect the breakdown voltage.

The classification for D1816 dielectric breakdown voltage results depends on the primary voltage class of the equipment and is as follows, for the two gap settings (dielectric breakdown voltages are in kilovolts):

D1816 Dielectric Breakdown Voltage
1 mm gap setting

Equipment
Voltage Class

AC

QU

UN

< 69 kV

> 23 kV

< 23 kV
> 18 kV

< 18 kV

> 69 kV
< 230 kV

> 28 kV

< 28 kV
> 23 kV

< 23 kV

> 230 kV

> 30 kV

< 30 kV
> 25 kV

< 25 kV

D1816 Dielectric Breakdown Voltage
2 mm gap setting

Equipment
Voltage Class

AC

QU

UN

< 69 kV

> 40 kV

< 40 kV
> 35 kV

< 35 kV

> 69 kV
< 230 kV

> 47 kV

< 47 kV\
> 42 kV

< 42 kV

> 230 kV

> 50 kV

< 50 kV
> 45 kV

< 45 kV

Subject to the limitations and cautions described below, a QU or UN D1816 value should be investigated to determine the cause, and correct the condition, if appropriate.

In addition to being sensitive to moisture, particles, and contamination, the D1816 dielectric breakdown voltage method is also sensitive to the presence of dissolved gases. This limits the usefulness of this method also, although it is more widely applicable than the D877 method. A “good” D1816 result indicates that there is nothing seriously wrong with the dielectric breakdown strength of the oil. A “bad” D1816 result, however, does not always indicate that there is something wrong with the oil. Acceptable levels of the other materials to which the test is sensitive can be detected along with a normal amount of dissolved gas to depress the D1816 result so that it is no longer in the acceptable range.

Depending on the D1816 to provide meaningful results for smaller industrial and distribution class equipment that is gas blanketed is usually not terribly useful. Frequently, the D1816 results indicate there may be problems with the dielectric breakdown voltage when those problems are not real. Even for higher voltage classes, or larger equipment where dissolved gas levels are much reduced and where the D1816 may be recommended as a routine monitoring test, care must be taken when interpreting D1816 results to ensure that resources are not expended to chase down problems that do not exist except as a peculiarity of the test method.

Color:

ASTM Standard Method D1524 is a method for visual examination of electrical insulating oils in the field that includes estimation of the ASTM color. ASTM Standard Method D1500 is a laboratory determination for ASTM color. Results from the two methods are very similar, but not identical. Typically, the results are close enough to being equivalent that the difference does not affect any management decisions concerning the oil and the equipment, so it is largely a matter of convenience concerning which method to use.

The color of new transformer oil is very low, typically less than 0.5. As the oil ages and oxidizes, it gets darker. Contamination may also cause a rapid change in color.

Taken by itself, color has little meaning. “Bad” oil can be lightly colored, while dark oil can still be of like new quality in all other respects. Poor color of the oil rarely affects the performance of the oil in service. Further, reclaimed oil that meets or exceeds all other performance and quality criteria may still be somewhat dark in color.

Classification of color results is as follows:

ASTM Color

AC

QU

UN

< 3.5

--

> 3.5

An unacceptable result or a large change from one year to the next is normally investigated as to cause.

Specific Gravity:

Specific gravity is also (and more accurately) known as relative density. It is a physical property of the insulating oil and is simply the ratio of the mass of a specific volume of the oil to the mass of the same volume of water at the same temperature.

Naphthenic transformer oil has a relative density between 0.84 and 0.91. Most oils that are actually in service fall into a narrower range of about 0.86 to 0.89. Values lower than 0.84 typically indicate that the oil is a paraffinic oil, and some synthetic oils, particularly the synthetic isoparaffinic oils, also fall in this range. Values over 0.91 indicate contamination by higher density materials, and a normal “suspect” for such contamination is PCBs.

The classification for relative density is as follows:

Relative Density

AC

QU

UN

0.84 to 0.91

< 0.84

> 0.91

Relative density is a calculated ratio and has no specific units of measurement.

Relative density usually does not change as the oil is in-service because aging and oxidation have little effect. Values outside of the acceptable range or significant changes between normal monitoring intervals are of concern, and the cause should be identified.

Visual and Sediment:

Our standard method of doing a visual examination of oil is ASTM D1524. The oil sample is visually checked for cloudiness, turbidity, suspended particles, visible sediment or sludge, carbon, free water, or anything that is not clear, homogeneous transformer oil.

“Clear” is the only acceptable value for Visual, and “None” is the only acceptable value for Sediment. Cloudiness or turbidity indicates suspended water droplets, carbon, or sludge. Visible carbon indicates that there has been arcing in the equipment.

Any conditions other than acceptable values for both should be investigated further, and may require other diagnostic tests such as dissolved gas analysis, ICP analysis for dissolved metals, or particles and filming compounds analysis.

  Inhibitor Content  

2,6-ditertiary-butyl para-cresol (DBPC) and 2,6-ditertiary-butyl phenol (DBP) are used as oxidation inhibitors in transformer oil. Use of an oxidation inhibitor in the oil is recommended for equipment without adequate oil preservation systems where the dissolved oxygen content exceeds 1000 ppm.

Date:

This is the draw date for the sample.

% by Weight:

The standard method we use to determine oxidation inhibitor content is ASTM D2668. Oxidation inhibitor content is reported as weight percent of total inhibitor in the oil.

The classification of results for oxidation inhibitor content (weight percent) is as follows:

Oxidation Inhibitor Content

AC

QU

UN

> 0.2%

> 0.1%
< 0.2%

< 0.1%

The optimum level for oxidation inhibitor is 0.3% in oil where use of inhibitor is recommended. Inhibiting the oil is always recommended, regardless of expected dissolved oxygen content, if the oil has been maintained previously using reclamation procedures.

The service recommendation when the inhibitor content is UN, but other oil quality results (liquid screen tests and liquid power factor) are all AC, is to properly reinhibit the oil in the equipment. If one or more of the other oil quality results are QU or UN, hot oil cleaning is recommended.

  Liquid Power Factor  

Date:

This is the draw date for the sample.

25 C:

The liquid power factor result and classification for the test run at 25 degrees Celsius.

100 C:

The liquid power factor result and classification for the test run at 100 degrees Celsius.

The standard test method that we use for liquid power factor is ASTM D924. The test is valuable for assessing new oil from a supplier and for evaluating new oil installed in equipment. Initially, liquid power factor at both 25C and 100C are very low for good quality, properly installed oil. As the oil continues in service, there are a number of conditions that degrade the oil that show up as increases in the liquid power factor results.

Liquid power factor, and the closely related dissipation factor, are direct measures of the dielectric losses of oil exposed to an alternating current field. Contamination of the oil by moisture or by many other contaminants will increase the liquid power factor. The aging and oxidation of the oil also elevates the liquid power factor values. Almost everything “bad” that can happen to the insulating oil will cause the liquid power factor to increase.

Liquid power factor determinations are run on transformer oil at two temperatures: 25C and 100C. This is done because the two readings, and how they change over time, can be useful in diagnosing which condition (moisture, oil oxidation, or contamination) is causing a high power factor. Further, the 100C value is many times more sensitive to small changes in oil characteristics.

Liquid power factor values are usually small numbers, so we report the liquid power factor as a percentage. As an example, new oil installed in a new transformer of primary voltage class less than 230 kV will typically have a 25C liquid power factor of no more than 0.0005 – which we would report as 0.05%.

In-service values for classifying liquid power factor values are as follows:

Liquid Power Factor Values

 

AC

QU

UN

@25C

< 0.1%

> 0.1%
< 0.3%

> 0.3%

@100C

< 3.0%

> 3.0%
< 4.0%

> 4.0%

The 100C value is always considered more carefully than the 25C value when determining whether there is a problem. QU or UN values for liquid power factor should be investigated and the cause should be diagnosed. Reclaiming the oil or hot oil cleaning the transformer will reduce the liquid power factor. Drying out the oil may also improve the liquid power factor, particularly the 25C reading.

A “first time” bad reading may not indicate a problem, though. Care should be taken before committing to maintenance based on a high liquid power factor reading, since elevated values frequently are only temporary. Extremely elevated liquid power factors at 100C in transformer oil usually indicate contamination.

  Karl Fischer Moisture Content  

Date:

This is the draw date for the sample.

Temp (C):

This is the bottom oil (sample) temperature, recorded when the sample was drawn. If the actual sample temperature is not documented, an estimated temperature (example: 20E) will be listed. This is the temperature used to perform the calculations for % saturation and % moisture by dry weight.

PPM:

Parts per million moisture content. The Karl Fischer titration performed according to our standard method, ASTM D1533, reports moisture in ppm by weight (milligrams moisture per kilogram sample – mg/kg) in the oil.

% Saturation:

This value is calculated from the ppm value and the sample temperature and is the relative degree, expressed in percent, to which the oil is saturated with moisture. This is calculated according to a standard equation. The classification (AC, QU, UN) is dependent on voltage class, and the upper values for the AC ranges are drawn from the maximum moisture content, expressed as % saturation, listed in IEEE Standard C57.106-2002.

% Moisture by Dry Weight:

This value is calculated from the ppm value and the sample temperature using the Myers Multiplier method. % moisture by dry weight is the calculated weight percent of moisture in the solid insulation. The grade listed, A through F, is dependent on voltage class and is determined according to an internal scale that is influenced by the maximum moisture content in the solid insulation from the IEEE standard, C57.106-2002.

By itself, particularly for mineral oil filled transformers, the moisture content in parts per million (ppm) is not terribly useful. The ppm value is useful in evaluating moisture results for applications other than oil filled transformers and other equipment.

Moisture in electrical equipment presents two conditions that are detrimental. First, moisture raises the risk of dielectric failure in the equipment. The most serious condition that could occur would be if there were sufficient moisture present to cause free water to come in contact with energized conductors, as this would lead to immediate and catastrophic failure. Second, moisture contributes to accelerated aging of the insulating liquid and of the solid insulation. Moisture degradation of the solid insulation causes permanent damage and premature loss of equipment life.

The risk of dielectric failure is related directly to the percent relative saturation of the oil with water. The permanent premature aging of the solid insulation is directly related to the percent moisture content of the solid insulation. The moisture content values that are obtained from the Karl Fischer titration are used to calculate percent saturation in the oil and percent moisture by dry weight in the solid insulation.

The ranges used to classify percent saturation values by primary voltage class are as follows:

Percent Saturation Values

Voltage Class

AC

QU

UN

< 69 kV

< 15%

> 15%
< 20%

> 20%

> 69 kV
< 230 kV

< 8%

> 8%
< 12%

> 12%

> 230 kV

< 5%

> 5%
< 7%

> 7%

The grading system for percent moisture by dry weight values in solid insulation is as follows:

Percent Moisture by Dry Weight Values

Voltage Class

A

B

C

D

F

< 69 kV

0 to 1.25%

1.26% to 2.00%

2.01% to 2.50%

2.51% to 4.00%

4.01% and up

> 69 kV < 230 kV

0 to 0.85%

0.86% to 1.35%

1.36% to 1.70%

1.71% to 2.65%

2.66% and up

> 230 kV

0 to 0.55%

0.56% to 0.85%

0.86% to 1.05%

1.06% to 1.70%

1.71% and up

Moisture values, especially the calculated values of percent saturation and percent moisture by dry weight, are subject to fluctuations based on sampling conditions, ambient temperature conditions, and fluctuations in transformer load and operating temperature. A first time determination that a transformer is wet may be due to one of these conditions. If moisture results suddenly indicate a wet transformer – for example, a first test or one that is inconsistent with past history – it is frequently more responsible to retest the transformer before concluding that a dry out procedure is required.

Confirmed QU and UN percent saturation values should be addressed by an appropriate dry out procedure, since these values represent an increased chance of dielectric failure of the equipment.

For % moisture by dry weight, the top end or “most wet” limit of the A range represents the maximum percent moisture by dry weight content of the insulation paper where accelerated aging has not yet begun. At all levels above this range, moisture should be removed by suitable field dry out procedures. This task becomes progressively harder and more expensive as the moisture levels go up. The D range represents a practical limit for removing moisture in a cost effective manner – if moisture advances into the F range, the only practical response is equipment replacement.

  Furan Analysis  

Date:

This is the draw date for the sample.

5H2F:

5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde content in ppb, in micrograms 5H2F per kilogram sample – ug/kg.

2FOL:

2-furyl alcohol content in ppb, ug/kg.

2FAL:

2-furaldehyde content in ppb, ug/kg.

2ACF:

2-acetyl furan content in ppb, ug/kg.

5M2F:

5-methyl-2-furaldehyde content in ppb, ug/kg.

Total:

The total content of these five furanic compounds in ppb, ug/kg.

Recommendation:

This includes a service recommendation (typically, a recommended retest interval or other recommendation such as “investigate”) for the most recent set of furan test data. Also, there is a standard paragraph with an interpretation or diagnosis for the most recent set of furan data.

Both parts of the recommendation are assigned during review of the data by a laboratory supervisor and are specific to a given set of results.

Calculated DP:

The furan results are used to calculate an average expected DP for the paper in the equipment. The calculation is dependent upon whether the transformer insulation is made up of thermally upgraded paper or not.

Est. Life Remaining:

The calculated DP is used to estimate the percentage of the solid insulation life that remains.

The solid insulation in a transformer is made up of paper. Paper is made up of cellulose fibers. Cellulose is a polymer formed from glucose molecules. When the paper is brand new, before it has been installed in a transformer and factory dried, the average cellulose polymer chain is 1000 to 1200 glucose molecules long. Installation and drying breaks down the cellulose a little bit, so that new paper in a new transformer has slightly shorter polymer chains – about 800 to 1000 glucose molecules long. We call the average cellulose chain length the “Degree of Polymerization” (DP) of the paper. As the paper ages, there is a natural and gradual breakdown of the polymer chains. As the chains get shorter, the mechanical strength of the paper is also reduced.

DP of the paper has a direct relationship to the mechanical strength (tensile strength) of the paper. When DP has been reduced by aging to 200, the paper is so weak that any stress will disrupt the paper and lead to failure. This is the practical definition of the end of reliable life for the solid insulation and therefore the end of life for the equipment.

When the cellulose chain breaks and two shorter chains are formed, the breakdown process “kicks out” one or more of the glucose molecules and also creates some water, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide. The glucose molecule changes chemically during this process and forms a compound containing a furan ring.

The change in furan content – the amount of furanic compounds generated during the testing interval – is the most important parameter for determining whether there is an active fault in the equipment that needs to be addressed. For a first analysis, where there is no past history – or where the past history is so old as to be virtually meaningless – we use the following standards for interpreting results:

0 to 20 ppb total furans Background, this is essentially a new transformer.
21 to 100 ppb total furans: Acceptable (AC), this represents normal aging.
101 to 250 ppb total furans: Questionable (QU), this represents probable accelerated aging.
251 ppb total furans and up: Unacceptable (UN), this represents significant accelerated aging.

In addition to our AC, QU, and UN ranges, we consider very high levels to be of more immediate concern. Levels over 1000 ppb indicate severe, irreversible damage to the solid insulation. We consider this to be the start of the “danger zone” because we start to see transformer failures in the range of 1000 to 1500 ppb total furans. We typically do not recommend reclaiming or other oil maintenance procedures for transformers where the total furan content is in this range. End of reliable life for a transformer with thermally upgraded insulation that has aged gradually, without hot spots, is approximately 2800 ppb total furans.

  Gas Chromatography

 

Dissolved gas analysis is a critical test for monitoring the mechanical and electrical operation of electrical equipment. It is particularly useful for diagnosing fault conditions and operational problems with transformers and load tap changers.

Date:

This is the draw date for the sample.

Hydrogen:

Hydrogen (H2) content in parts per million (ppm) by volume, microlitres H 2 per litre of sample – uL/L.

Oxygen:

Oxygen (O2) content in parts per million (ppm) by volume – uL/L.

Nitrogen:

Nitrogen (N2) content in parts per million (ppm) by volume – uL/L.

Methane:

Methane (CH4) content in parts per million (ppm) by volume – uL/L.

Carbon monoxide:

Carbon monoxide (CO) content in parts per million (ppm) by volume – uL/L.

Carbon dioxide:

Carbon dioxide (CO2) content in parts per million (ppm) by volume – uL/L.

Ethane:

Ethane (C2H6) content in parts per million (ppm) by volume – uL/L.

Ethylene:

Ethylene (C2H4) content in parts per million (ppm) by volume – uL/L.

Acetylene:

Acetylene (C2H2) content in parts per million (ppm) by volume – uL/L.

Total Combustible:

The sum of concentrations for the six combustible gases – hydrogen, methane, carbon monoxide, ethane, ethylene, and acetylene – in parts per million (ppm) by volume – uL/L.

Total Gas:

The sum of concentrations for all nine gases – the combustible gases plus oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide – in parts per million (ppm) by volume – uL/L.

Recommendation:

This includes a service recommendation (typically, a recommended retest interval or other recommendation such as “investigate”) for the most recent set of gas-in-oil test data. Also, there is a standard paragraph with an interpretation or diagnosis for the most recent set of dissolved gas data.

Both parts of the recommendation are assigned during review of the data by a laboratory supervisor and are specific to a given set of results.

Fault conditions generate gases dissolved in the oil. Gases from the atmosphere also dissolved in the oil. The dissolved gas data can be interpreted using specific qualitative and quantitative tools to confirm normal operation of the equipment or to diagnose that a fault condition exists.

Quantitative tools such as key gas analysis and quantitative tools such as ratio methods of interpretation have high reliability for diagnosing the type of abnormal condition present – faults such as arcing, sparking, partial discharge, general overheating, and hot spot overheating. Changes in the gas profile and in the concentrations of the individual gases are extremely important to providing an appropriate diagnosis and recommendation.

The industry standard for interpreting dissolved gas analysis results is ANSI/IEEE Standard C57.104: Guide for the Interpretation of Gases Generated in Oil-Immersed Transformers. Our interpretations and recommendations are based in large part upon this standard, modified somewhat to incorporate our experience and database developed over the past thirty years.

  ICP Metals-In-Oil  

Date:

This is the draw date for the sample.

Aluminum:

Aluminum (Al) content in parts per million (ppm) by weight, milligrams Al per kilogram of sample – mg/kg.

Iron:

Iron (Fe) content in parts per million (ppm) by weight – mg/kg.

Copper:

Copper (Cu) content in parts per million (ppm) by weight – mg/kg.

Recommendation:

This includes a service recommendation (typically, a recommended retest interval or other recommendation such as “investigate”) for the most recent set of ICP test data. Also, there is a standard paragraph with an interpretation or diagnosis for the most recent set of dissolved metals data.

Both parts of the recommendation are assigned during review of the data by a laboratory supervisor and are specific to a given set of results.

Our standard method to detect and quantify a number of metals uses Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrophotometry (ICP). The ICP has been used successfully for years to determine metal content of lubricating oils. A new ASTM standard method for ICP analysis of transformer oil is being written, and our standard procedures meet the requirements of this proposed new method.

The profile of metals does not usually have a classification as to whether the results are acceptable, questionable, or unacceptable. Each profile is interpreted according to the diagnostic value of the results. Most often, metals in oil analysis is performed to help further identify and provide the location for transformer fault conditions that were diagnosed earlier by dissolved gas analysis.

  PCB Content  

The standard methods used match the patterns on the chromatograms – output from the testing instrument – to patterns for the calibration standards. The calibration standards are made to match commercial mixtures of PCBs (Aroclors) used in PCB applications.

Date:

This is the draw date for the sample.

1242:

PCB content matching the pattern for Aroclor 1242, expressed in parts per million (ppm) by weight, milligrams Aroclor 1242 per kilogram of sample – mg/kg.

1254:

PCB content matching the pattern for Aroclor 1254, expressed in parts per million (ppm) by weight – mg/kg.

1260:

PCB content matching the pattern for Aroclor 1260, expressed in parts per million (ppm) by weight – mg/kg.

Other:

PCB content that does not match any of the three most common Aroclors, expressed in parts per million by weight – mg/kg. “Other” may include other Aroclors, such as Aroclor 1016 or Aroclor 1248. This value may also include PCBs quantified by something other than our “usual” standard methods where the PCBs do not conform to any known pattern for a commercial PCB mixture.

Total:

The total ppm content, representing the sum of the 1242, 1254, 1260, and Other values, expressed in parts per million by weight – mg/kg.

Class:

Where appropriate, we report the classification of the equipment according to Federal PCB rules contained in 40 CFR 761. The classifications take into account EPA’s advice to owners to take the recognized error in their test results into consideration when planning a PCB management strategy. “Non-PCB” is less than 45 ppm. “PCB-Contaminated” is 45 ppm or more, but less than 450 ppm. “PCB” is 450 ppm or more.

Label Color:

Where appropriate, a customer may affix a label to the equipment denoting the classification according to Federal rules. “Green” is for “non-PCB”. “Orange” is for “PCB-Contaminated”. “Yellow” is for “PCB”. Labels supplied by S. D. Myers, Inc. at the time of testing are not intended to provide customers with materials sufficient for compliance with rules concerning labeling and marking of PCBs. These are for convenience, only.

Our standard procedure for PCB analysis is to use the ASTM standard method for PCBs in insulating oil using gas chromatography with either a packed column or mega-bore capillary column and an electron capture detector, D4059. For classifying equipment for environmental management according to the Federal PCBs rules contained in 40CFR761, this method of analysis and reporting is preferred.

There are other PCB analysis methods, mainly those EPA methods from SW-846, that are used as appropriate for waste oils and solids, to characterize spill sites, and to confirm clean-up efforts. Some of these are Aroclor matching patterns while others quantify individual congeners of PCB.

The generally accepted limit of detection for method D4059 is 2 ppm. Results below this level are reported as ND – “none detected”.

  Notes  

The classifications listed in this help file (AC, QU, UN) and the descriptions of the tests themselves are for transformers filled with mineral oil dielectric fluid. For other equipment types or for fluids other than mineral oil, contact your S. D. Myers representative for assistance in interpreting these results. In the Lab OnLine results and reports themselves, the classifications have been assigned using the proper classifications for oil filled transformers and for all other equipment types and fluids, as appropriate.

For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM web site, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards volume information, refer to the standard's Document Summary page on the ASTM web site.

For referenced IEEE standards, visit the IEEE web site, www.ieee.org. Standards are available for purchase on-line.

©2006 S.D. Myers, Inc.  |  180 South Ave.  |  Tallmadge, Ohio 442778  |  USA  |  1.800.444.9580  |  1.330.630.7000